A
Brief History of Mesa, Arizona
Lehi Settlement and Fort Utah
The completion of the transcontinental
railroad in 1869 in Utah increased pressure for expansion beyond Utah.
Easier transportation had augmented Utah's population, thus reducing the
amount of available arable land. Consequently, the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints officials asked Daniel Webster Jones to lead
a group to settle in Arizona.
Jones had explored parts of Arizona and
Mexico in 1875-76, while he had been on a mission to the native people
in the Valley.. Jones agreed to lead the colony, but requested families
that had many children and were poor, so they would not be able to
resettle elsewhere easily.
The Jones, Turley, Rogers, Steele, Biggs,
McRae, Williams, and Merrill families gathered for their journey at St.
George, Utah. They traveled in wagons for three months, and arrived in
Lehi (just north of Mesa) in March of 1877. The route they took forced
them to leave heavy equipment, such as stoves, sewing machines and
plows, along the way.
The Lehi residents lived the United
Order: that is, they shared the supplies and food raised. Their first
building was a brush shed used as a school, church, and meeting place.
In July 1877, they built Fort Utah with adobe bricks. A replica of this
structure is in front of the Mesa Historical Museum, nearby its original
location at Lehi and Horne Roads.
Jones' invitation to the natives to live
with them became a contributing factor that caused half of the colony to
leave. Those who left had brought more of the livestock, which they took
with them to St. David, near Mexico. The Lehi group that was left was
especially small and poor; it had a difficult time surviving.
A flood in Lehi in 1891 destroyed Fort
Utah and carried away acres of valuable farmland in low-lying areas.
Because Lehi was prone to flooding, had a more limited land area and
fewer irrigation ditches, Mesa outgrew Lehi. When the railroad was
placed in Mesa about 1895, the growth pattern accelerated. Lehi became
part of Mesa in 1970, but it has maintained its independent, more rural
character.
 
|